|
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] RE: iSCSI: Login ProposalDoes this mean that we are not considering the login code sent out by Matthew as a proposal? >-----Original Message----- >From: owner-ips@ece.cmu.edu [mailto:owner-ips@ece.cmu.edu]On Behalf Of >Julian Satran >Sent: Friday, August 24, 2001 12:49 AM >To: ips@ece.cmu.edu >Subject: Re: iSCSI: Login Proposal > > > >Steve, > >Reading Mathew's note regarding the fact that he knew and supported >introduction of explicit state >I thought that we are discussing only the modified parts as I sent them out >to the list. > >Julo > >Steve Senum <ssenum@cisco.com>@ece.cmu.edu on 24-08-2001 02:09:29 > >Please respond to Steve Senum <ssenum@cisco.com> > >Sent by: owner-ips@ece.cmu.edu > > >To: ietf-ips <ips@ece.cmu.edu> >cc: >Subject: Re: iSCSI: Login Proposal > > > >Julian and Matthew: > >Is was wondering what the status of this issue is? >Are both proposals still on the table? > >Regards, >Steve Senum > > >
Home Last updated: Tue Sep 04 01:03:54 2001 6315 messages in chronological order |