|
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: iSCSI: Last call issues for the Naming and Discovery documentMarjorie- Thanks for the detailed comments. I've embedded my responses below. -- Mark > "KRUEGER,MARJORIE (HP-Roseville,ex1)" wrote: > > Some cleanup items for the iSCSI Naming and Discovery document: > > 1) Sec.1 p.5 and p. 14 define "iSCSI Address" but contradict each other. p. 5 defines it as > simply and IP address [& port] and p. 14 says it's the iSCSI name and IP addr [+port]. Paragraph > 5 needs to be modified to match p. 14. How about (page 5): iSCSI nodes also have addresses. An iSCSI address specifies a single path to an iSCSI node and consists of the iSCSI name, plus a transport (TCP) address which uses the following format: <domain-name>[:<port>] Where <domain-name> is one of: > > 2) Sec. 1 p. 17 says > > In this example, Robert's SSN is like the iSCSI Name, his phone number and addresses are analogous > to the TCP addresses which make up an iSCSI session, and "Robert Smith" would be a human-friendly > label for this person. > The statement that Robert Smith's addresses are like an iSCSI session makes no sense to me. An > iSCSI session is a relationship between two separate iSCSI nodes. Robert's addresses are only one > end of the relationship. Perhaps this paragraph means to say his phone number, etc. are like an > iSCSI nodes TCP addresses? You're right; that's what I had meant. I'll fix the wording. > > 3) Sec. 1.1 p. 1 first sentence "iSCSI has given the Organizational naming authority additional > flexibility by permitting it to hand out local naming authority to > subordinate organizations." > > I suggest changing this to "The iSCSI naming scheme was constructed to give an organizational > naming authority the flexibility to further subdivide the responsibility for name creation to > subordinate naming authorities." Use of "capital O" in Organization implies there's some globally > defined naming authority that this sentence is referring to. > > 4) General comment on section 1.1 To reflect the definition in the iSCSI main draft, sec. > 2.2.6.3.2, either the examples need to be changed to show the ":" after the reversed domain name > in the string, or the text needs to be changed to say that these substrings are sub-domain names. > > 5)sec. 1.1, p 15 - this example is missing the ":" following the reversed domain name. > > 6)sec. 3, p 1 - the last sentence is missing something. It's "Moreover, iSCSI discovery > mechanism only deals with target discovery and one still needs to use the SCSI protocol for LUN > discovery." and should be "Moreover, the iSCSI discovery mechanisms listed here only deal with > target discovery and one still needs to use the SCSI protocol for LUN discovery." > > 7) sec. 3 p 2 - 2nd sentence is missing something. It's "The goal of iSCSI discovery mechanism is > to provide low overhead support for small iSCSI setups, and scalable discovery solutions for large > enterprise setups." and should be "The goal of iSCSI discovery mechanisms are to provide low > overhead support for small iSCSI setups, and scalable discovery solutions for large enterprise > setups." > > 8) sec. 3, p 5 the sentence "This mechanism assumes that the IP address and TCP port information > are already available to the initiator." is missing something, should be "This mechanism assumes > that the target's IP address and TCP port information are already available to the initiator." > > 9) appendix B.3, I think there's a typo in the first sentence. "This gateway presents logical > targets (iSCSI Names) to the initiators, and maps them to real iSCSI targets as it chooses." > should be "This gateway presents logical targets (iSCSI Names) to the initiators, and maps them to > SCSI targets as it chooses." > > 10) appendix B.4 another typo? "An iSCSI proxy is a SCSI gateway..." should be "An iSCSI proxy > is an iSCSI gateway.." > > 11) appendix B.5, p 4 refers to a "DMZ" There is no definition of this term in this document. > Needs to either be defined or substitute some more descriptive phrase here. > > > Regards, > > Marjorie Krueger > Networked Storage Architecture > Networked Storage Solutions > Hewlett-Packard -- Mark A. Bakke Cisco Systems mbakke@cisco.com 763.398.1054
Home Last updated: Wed Sep 11 19:19:03 2002 11820 messages in chronological order |